Sturdy Hurtigruten Ship Anchored at the Quay. Storm. Chalk drawing.

|

First Upload (German) : |

Norbert’s shop window at Zeil 24 in Frankfurt am Main

Here are informations and questions of my emails to Norway.

I bought a striking chalk drawing from a bookseller friend’s antiquarian bookshop on the Zeil, depicting a sturdy steamer at the quay. It’s stormy and snowing, judging by the diagonally drawn black lines. The light is surreal, the background dark except for a narrow strip of light. The ship bears the Norwegian coat of arms on its side. The lines were drawn quickly but confidently. The composition captures an immediate impression. The vanishing point of the striking perspective lies just outside the right edge of the frame, where the stormy wind hits the stern. At first, I thought it was a fishing vessel, a stern trawler (Wikipedia), but then I thought of one of the Hurtigruten ships, like the Kong Gudroed or the MS Erling Jarl (Wikipedia).
Norbert got the elegantly framed drawing from one of the private libraries he frequently visits, but I have no idea where it came from. Like an ordinary junk remover, he takes everything that’s offered to him as „bycatch.“ He himself is also a painter of tiny landscapes, which are displayed framed in his shop.
Condition?
Under the glass, the drawing paper is slightly wavy, the cardboard backing is a bit foxed, and it hasn’t been opened in over half a century. I don’t want to open it now. A 3 cm wide strip of brown paper has been glued all around the frame over the small nails hammered in at intervals of 4 to 6 cm.
Frame 1.1 cm thick, outer dimensions 36 x 48 cm, inner dimensions 33.8 cm x 45.5 cm.
Why am I writing to you? The picture speaks for itself, and I enjoy its mystery. I don’t see the missing signature as a flaw; it serves, if not the selling price, then at least the artist’s vanity. So, what do I want to know? First: The ship obscures the horizon except for a partially visible warehouse (on the left). I’m troubled by what lies hidden behind it. You don’t know either, but perhaps the ship or the surroundings seem familiar.
Perhaps the atmosphere is also familiar, especially during these gloomy pre-Christmas weeks. Is the ship at anchor, either regularly or due to a storm warning? Does the subject matter or the drawing technique remind you of any Norwegian painter?
I have never been to your country. I am currently writing to museums in three different coastal cities.

Curator Bård Gram Økland from Bergen’s Sjøfartsmuseum responds on December 9th:

„Hello, and thank you for sending the picture.We have discussed it here at the museum, and we agree that the motif is challenging to interpret. The painting is not particularly well executed and provides us with few clues to work from. There is nothing in the landscape or the harbor area that gives clear indications of where the ship might be located. Based on the size and number of lifeboats, it is likely a passenger ship. The flag painted on the hull indicates neutrality markings, as used during World War I and again from September 1939 to April 1940. Considering the size of the vessel, we believe it might date from the period 1939–1940.It may also be a Hurtigruten ship, so I would recommend contacting the Hurtigruten Museum for further assessment.”

I receive a sensitive answer from the “Trondheim Art Museum” – plus enthusiasts‘ addresses 

Thank you so much for sharing with me, this mysterious drawing of an anchored ship in a winter storm. Although I enjoy the drawing, I am not able to tell where this is from, whom might have drawn it, nor am in any way an expert of ships. It would have helped to identify it and the port, if the ship had a name or the drawing a date. Is there no information on the back of the frame? However. Do you have access to Facebook? There are groups on Facebook that attract people with this very competence. I have found a group called “Norske skip 1850-2025” Norske skip 1850-2025 | Facebook. And also this one “Dampalderen – Fyrbøterens tidsalder” https://www.facebook.com/groups/267674476724418/ I hope you are able to join these groups and share your mystery. All the best for these weeks of Advent.
Med vennlig hilsen/Jïjnjh heelsegh Åse Fredrikson, Samlingsforvalter Trondheim art museum

Even without Facebook, I connect with people. On December 17th, the webmaster of the association „Norskeskip“ wrote to me:

Hello Detlev, Sorry for the late reply.
I have seen your photo/ painting and this looks like one of the ships that travelled the Coast of Norway with mail and passangers. I will guess late 1920 – 1930 and throught the war due to the Norwegian flag-. I will take a guess that its maybe a ship belonging to The Bergenske Dampskipselskap AS (Bergenske Dampfschiffgesellschaft AG). Have a merry Christmas“
Even though the drawing depicts the ship’s characteristically slender funnel rather carelessly and in a blurred manner, the company’s typical black-and-white sequence can be discerned, if one looks for it. But would a clearer, more precise design have suited the sketchy style? Incidentally, the striped funnel seems to have been common on the Hurtigruten line.

The website of „Bergenske Dampskipselskap AS“ offers a glimpse into Norwegian coastal shipping and more! See for yourself!

(https://www.timetableimages.com/maritime/images/bergen.htm)

The world of pre-war shipyards and shipping companies, and a 20th century that bestowed such individual destinies upon its ships, emerge. Even the South America route via Madeira from childhood reading material reappears.
The Hurtigruten line was operated by several shipping companies. Bergen Line, for example, deployed the Irma, Polarlys, Midnatsol, and Mira in 1936.
The Route was operated jointly with ships of Det Nordenfjeldske Dampskibsselskab (Dronning Maud, Erling Jarl, Kong Harald, Prinsesse Ragnhild and Sigurd Jarl), Det Stavangerske Dampskibsselskab (Sanct Svithun) and Vesteraalens Dampskibsselskab (Finmarken, Lofoten and Richard With).

Source : timetableimages.com

Source : vest39a

 The history of Hurtigruten shipping according to de.wikipedia.org:

The en.wikipedia.org article is structured differently, and as they recommend to consult the German-language page, I prefer simply to translate 


Sweden_and_Norway_MKL_Bd._14_130535988-scaled.jpg (wikimedia)      CLICK TWICE TO ENLARGE !

Shipping connections along the west coast of Norway (map circa 1890) (wikimedia, click to enlarge) To understand the importance and necessity of the scheduled service along the Norwegian coast, it is helpful to consider the country’s geographical situation: Modern-day Norway stretches approximately 2,650 kilometers from north to south. Historically, it was the southern part of the country, favored by a relatively mild climate, that dominated in terms of both population and economic power. The coastal settlements and communities in the north of the country, which depended on fishing in the fish-rich waters of the Lofoten, Vesterålen, and Barents Seas, lacked suitable transport routes, especially for the landed fish, but also for basic supplies of goods and commodities that could not be produced locally. For example, from the beginning of the 19th century, there were only sporadic connections between the Lofoten archipelago in the far north and the trading metropolis of Bergen. From 1870, the Hamburg route operated along the coast. However, especially during the long winters, the entire north of the country was practically cut off from the outside world.

The Norwegian government recognized this north-south divide and sought ways to improve transport connections to the north. With a total coastline of 83,283 kilometers, the government focused on merchant shipping. From 1875 onwards, based on existing, smaller shipping lines, initial plans were developed for a regular, state-subsidized shipping service between Stavanger and Bergen in the south and the larger coastal towns in northern Norway.

Beginnings of Hurtigruten

The Hurtigruten was founded by a private shipping company, Vesteraalens Dampskibsselskab (VDS), and first sailed between Trondheim and Hammerfest in 1893. The first regular and, above all, year-round mail service between southern and northern Norway was thanks to the efforts of the experienced Captain Richard With. Together with the pilot Andreas Holte, he had meticulously kept records of the voyages through the waters along the Norwegian coast from 1882 onwards.
He was the first to dare to navigate the route to Hammerfest at night and during the dark winter months – a speed increase that was a prerequisite for the state subsidies, without which a mail ship service could not have been financed. Previously, in 1889 and 1890, a concept for a year-round shipping line along the entire west coast had been developed on behalf of the government by the respected Captain August Kriegsmann Gran, who was employed by the Oslo Ministry of the Interior. This culminated in a tender for a steamship line, published on April 18, 1891. On July 2, 1893, the Vesterålen, under Captain Richard With, set sail from Trondheim to Hammerfest.
This initial route, which took a total of 67 hours to complete, called at nine ports: Rørvik, Brønnøysund, Sandnessjøen, Bodø, Svolvær, Lødingen, Harstad, Tromsø, and Skjervøy.
< Kong Gudrød  

Two more Hurtigruten routes followed, so that by the turn of the century there were three postal ship routes: The first ran from Trondheim to Hammerfest, the second from Bergen to Hammerfest, and the third from Hammerfest eastward to Vadsø – this last route was extended in 1908 to its current terminus, Kirkenes. These routes were now served twice a week – summer and winter. This fundamentally changed life for the inhabitants of the rugged coastal region of northern Norway. The Hurtigruten shaped and united the country. The arduous overland route through the craggy landscape could now be avoided.

In 1898, the route had been extended south beyond Bergen to Stavanger. However, by 1919, road and rail connections in the more densely populated south of the country had been so extensively developed that postal ship service was discontinued in this area. Bergen was and remained the southern starting and turning point of the route.

In the summer of 1922, the Risøyrenna – the Risørinne, a navigable, natural narrow waterway between the Vesterålen islands of Andøya and Hinnøya – was inaugurated. This route is still part of the ships‘ route today. From June 1, 1936, the three former lines were combined into a single, continuous connection linking Bergen in the south with Kirkenes in the north. From then on, a daily departure could be guaranteed with 14 ships from six shipping companies.

 

World War II and Post-War Period

During the two World Wars, the second of which had particularly devastating consequences for the communities in northern Norway with the occupation of the country, scheduled coastal express services were largely impossible. Nevertheless, Hurtigruten ships were used for coastal transport and troop transport; and in some cases, scheduled services could also be maintained. The period from 1940 to 1945 also saw the majority of ship losses and accidents. To maintain the vital supply lines to communities in the north, the shipping companies, after their Hurtigruten ships were either confiscated or wrecked, resorted to using small cargo ships and fishing cutters as transport vessels on the Hurtigruten route between 1940 and 1945. The Erling Jarl, commissioned in 1949 After the end of World War II, only 3 of the original 14 ships were seaworthy. A large-scale, government-supported shipbuilding program enabled daily service between Trondheim and Hammerfest from 1950 onwards. By 1956, a total of ten nearly identical ships had been commissioned, allowing for the re-establishment of a regular liner service.[6] [6] While the line initially used ordinary, often second-hand steamships, this series marked the first deployment of a special ship type developed specifically for Hurtigruten. Each subsequent generation of ships incorporated new developments and experience gained from previous types. As a result, the appearance and design of the ships have changed considerably; they are still ship types specifically designed for this service. (…) January 15, 2026

 

World War II and Post-War Period

During the two World Wars, the second of which had particularly devastating consequences for the communities in northern Norway with the occupation of the country, scheduled coastal express services were largely impossible. Nevertheless, Hurtigruten ships were used for coastal transport and troop transport;[4] in some cases, the regular liner service could also be maintained. Most ship losses and accidents occurred between 1940 and 1945. To continue providing essential supplies to the communities in the north, the shipping companies, after their Hurtigruten ships had either been requisitioned or damaged, resorted to using small cargo ships and fishing cutters as transport vessels on the Hurtigruten route between 1940 and 1945.

The Erling Jarl, commissioned in 1949
After the end of World War II, only 3 of the original 14 ships were seaworthy. A large-scale, government-supported shipbuilding program enabled daily service between Trondheim and Hammerfest to resume in 1950. By 1956, a total of ten nearly identical ships had been commissioned, allowing for the re-establishment of regular liner service. 
While the line initially used ordinary, often second-hand, steamships, this series marked the first deployment of a special ship type developed specifically for Hurtigruten. Each subsequent generation of ships incorporated new developments and experience gained from previous types. As a result, the appearance and design of the ships have changed considerably; they are still ship types specifically designed for this service. (….)

 

15.1.2026

Schreiben Sie einen Kommentar

Ihre E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert